Max Houkes vs Daniel Michalski Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 20 May at 10:26 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Houkes vs D. Michalski

NED
1
Win
Played
2
Win

POL
1
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Houkes 1 - 2 Michalski
They have played 7 sets in total, with Max Houkes winning 3 and Daniel Michalski winning 4. The last match between Daniel Michalski and Max Houkes was at the Skopje Challenger, 20-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Max Houkes getting the victory 7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(8).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Houkes | 1 |
| Michalski | 2 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R1) Skopje Challenger(05-20-25)
(QF) M25 Wetzlar(08-02-24)
(R1) Liberec Challenger(07-31-23)
M. Houkes vs D. Michalski H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 64.90% (294-159) | Career Total W/L | 62.91% (290-171) |
| 1 | Clay | 2 |
| 11 | Titles | 15 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Houkes vs D. Michalski Match Preview:
- How do they compare in recent second serve performance? Michalski edges out Houkes, winning 45.57% of points compared to Houkes' 42.96%.
- Who's stronger in return games recently? Houkes performs better, securing 49.18% of second serve points, while Michalski claims 44.31%.
- Analyzing first serve returns shows negligible difference: Michalski 31.16% and Houkes 31.19%.
- Under pressure, Houkes has a slight advantage, saving 49.55% of breakpoints against Michalski's 49.2%.
- Who has a better overall performance over the past year? Houkes, with a win rate of 71.62%, outdoes Michalski's 66.67%.
- On favorite surfaces, both excel on clay, but who performs best? Houkes with 67% win rate, just 1% more than Michalski.
- Both have poor records on indoor hard courts, with Houkes not winning any match in their limited exposure.
- Which player has faced tougher competition recently? Houkes, with opponents averaging a rank of 328.76, compared to Michalski's 419.76.
- Their head-to-head record is tied, each having won once in two matchups, splitting the four sets played.
- Their last encounter on clay saw Houkes triumphing with a straight-sets win.
- Does the match typically go the distance? No deciding sets between them yet.
- How effective are they at converting break point chances lately? Michalski is slightly more efficient at 35.05% compared to Houkes' 33.87%.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Michalski holds a slight edge with a 64% success rate versus Houkes' 62% over the last year.
Editorial Prediction (May 20, 2025, UTC):
With both players showing strengths in different areas, the match promises to be closely contested. Michalski offers a slight advantage on second serves and break point conversion.
Houkes, however, excels in return games, faces tougher opponents, and has been more successful over the past year.
Both share a strong clay court game, and with Houkes having won their last matchup on this surface, he might just have the edge.
The prediction leans toward Max Houkes as the likely winner for this upcoming match.
Max Houkes vs Daniel Michalski Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Houkes vs D. Michalski H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 40 | Games Won | 39 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:38:11 | Average Match Time | 2:38:11 |
| 61% (164/268) | 1st Serve % | 60% (152/252) |
| 63% (104/164) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (97/152) |
| 48% (50/104) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (48/100) |
| 48% (13/27) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (12/30) |
| 42% (107/252) | Return Points Win % | 43% (114/268) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Houkes Recent Matches Played
D. Michalski Recent Matches Played

M. Houkes vs D. Michalski Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.90% (294/159) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.91% (290/171) |
| 62.42% (646/389) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.46% (636/416) |
| 55.70% (5388/4286) | Games Win/Loss | 54.14% (5189/4395) |
| 46.88% (15/17) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (33/33) |
| 66.91% (279/138) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.63% (252/132) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.45% (5/6) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 879 | Aces Total | 648 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1606 | Total Double Faults | 904 |
| 1:30:28 | Average Match Time | 1:49:11 |
| 407.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 504.68 |
| 61% (15476/25422) | 1st Serve % | 61% (18392/30109) |
| 67% (10444/15476) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (11932/18392) |
| 47% (4718/9946) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (6058/11717) |
| 48% (1410/2951) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1740/3650) |
| 44% (11219/25490) | Return Points Win % | 44% (13506/30484) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/5) |
| 49.52% (52/53) | Challenger W/L | 49.09% (81/84) |
| 70.14% (242/103) | Futures W/L | 71.97% (208/81) |
| 65% (290/446) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (286/452) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (52/107) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 66% (65/98) |
| 54% (73/135) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (79/139) |
| 89% (287/255) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (285/250) |
| 11% (287/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (285/34) |
| 22% (165/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (176/39) |